menu
Why You Need a Security Audit of Smart Contracts
Why You Need a Security Audit of Smart Contracts
You may find possible security flaws in your system by using smart contract security audits.

You may find possible security flaws in your system by using smart contract security audits. They enable you to fix these flaws before an evil actor takes use of them and destroys your platform.

 

With such cutting-edge technology, though, you might be asking what a smart contract audit is, why one is vital, and whether you actually need one.

 

What is a Smart Contract Audit?

An exhaustive, methodical examination and study of the code that a smart contract uses to communicate with a cryptocurrency or blockchain constitutes a smart contract audit. Finding defects, technical problems, and security gaps in the code is done using this technique. Experts in smart contract audits might use this to suggest solutions and make adjustments. The majority of smart contracts deal with expensive objects and financial assets, hence audits of these contracts are often necessary.

 

The existence of flaws or faults in the contract cannot be completely assured by a smart contract audit. It does, however, guarantee that the smart contract is secure because it has been examined by a tech professional.

 

Cyberattacks on Blockchains & Smart Contracts

It is the responsibility of blockchain developers to identify security flaws and address them before exploits are applied in actual attacks.

 

Baiting and the Reentrancy assault are the two primary strategies used by malicious actors to launch successful attacks. The second and trickier strategy requires a thorough understanding of blockchain smart contracts and related components like side-chain and cross-chain wallets, as well as familiarity with several protocols. The first strategy relies on social engineering techniques like convincing a victim to send cryptocurrency to the attacker's wallet.

 

These three notable blockchain assaults should be noted.

Wormhole

It is the responsibility of blockchain developers to identify security flaws and address them before exploits are applied in actual attacks.

 

Baiting and the Reentrancy assault are the two primary strategies used by malicious actors to launch successful attacks. The second and trickier strategy requires a thorough understanding of blockchain smart contracts and related components like side-chain and cross-chain wallets, as well as familiarity with several protocols. The first strategy relies on social engineering techniques like convincing a victim to send cryptocurrency to the attacker's wallet.

 

These three notable blockchain assaults should be noted.

Cream Financial

By taking advantage of a flaw in Cream Finance's flash loaning contract, hackers stole almost $130 million in Ethereum tokens. There are substantial drawbacks to the Cream Oracle technology and its approach to figuring out asset valuations.

 

The attacker modified the price of the yUSD pool used as collateral, making a 1 yUSD share equal to $2 by taking advantage of the restrictions in pricing computations done by smart contracts employed by CREAM Finance's platform.

 

As a consequence, Cream Finance reports that the attacker's initial deposit of $1.5B in yUSD quadrupled. The hacker exploited the $3B profit to drain the project's entire liquidity after converting their yUSD investment on Cream Finance to that amount.

 

One of the biggest blockchains currently in use, Binance Smart Chain, sees the daily emergence of hundreds of new projects and dApps.

Get an expert Cyphershield auditor's BSC Smart Contract Security Audit Report.