menu
The Lawyer Who Defended Abortion Rights at the Supreme Court Explains Real Experience
The Lawyer Who Defended Abortion Rights at the Supreme Court Explains Real Experience
This issue was significantly different since it was just about whether Roe should be overruled.

 

This issue was significantly different since it was just about whether Roe should be overruled.

 

The Supreme Court heard court proceedings this week in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, a Mississippi case that directly challenges Roe v. Wade. Julie Rikelman, the Center for Reproductive Rights' litigation director, advocated for the Jackson side on Wednesday and then appeared on Amicus to speak with Dahlia Lithwick about her encounter. Below is a snippet of their chat, trimmed and shortened for clarity.

 

The Center for Reproductive Rights' litigation director, Julie Rikelman, litigated Jackson v. Jackson Women's Health. The Mississippi case plainly contradicts Roe v. Wade. The stakes were bigger, she claims, but the case was far more about basic principles. "But enough about women," the remark went, "let's speak about the court's legitimacy."

 

It's really intriguing because it reminded me of Justice Ginsburg's early activism when she was working so hard to make a woman's life accessible to a court, except she was talking to courts full of males at the time, right? And all she was trying to convey was, "Stop for a moment, walk in my shoes, observe what a woman's life was like." And I truly felt like it was the thing you were aiming to achieve again in 2021.

 

You and the Solicitor General were both attempting to focus the court on women's problems. But it was drawn into these tangential debates about the legitimacy of the court, or, I don't know, adoption at some point.

 

And I was curious—how did it feel? Mississippi contended that women no longer need this right since conditions are better now than they were 50 years ago. How could women's ability to make this decision be any less important? "Well, leaving that data aside," says Chief Justice John Roberts.

 

Mississippi's Solicitor General stated that safe haven regulations were a factor in reversing 50 years of precedent. You can't make a woman decide whether or not to give up a child for adoption, according to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

 

I'm curious if understanding that there were females outside, that they were broadcasting the audio, that everybody else in the nation and, dare I say, outside the country was hearing to you somehow compensated out the fact that you were attempting to make females visible to a court that didn't worry

 

Visit us for more information : https://www.safeabortionpharma.com