The dark ages of Reefer Madness leading up to the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937, the original measure for outlawing the plant, only changed faces over the years but have remained a constant factor in the way the mainstream media presents information.
The other day I was scouring my Facebook feed and saw a post by Marc Emery, The Prince of Pot, about an article written by Laura Cudworth talking about “shatter” being the ‘highly addictive version of cannabis”.
Her article regurgitated the same old reefer madness through and through and even went on saying, “Whether it will overshadow crystal meth and oxycodone in popularity has yet to be seen.”
To even compare these substances with cannabis in any form is a position of deception with the motive to induce fear into any who read these kinds of articles.
The other day I was scouring my Facebook feed and saw a post by Marc Emery, The Prince of Pot, about an article written by Laura Cudworth talking about “shatter” being the ‘highly addictive version of cannabis”.
Her article regurgitated the same old reefer madness through and through and even went on saying, “Whether it will overshadow crystal meth and oxycodone in popularity has yet to be seen.”
To even compare these substances with cannabis in any form is a position of deception with the motive to induce fear into any who read these kinds of articles.
