How to find a scholarly article?
Writing and submitting a research article to a journal for publication is time-consuming and sometimes difficult. Obstacles to high-quality writing include lack of experience, poor writing habits, writing anxiety, unfamiliarity with the fundamentals of academic writing, lack of confidence in one's ability to write medically and scientifically, worry about failing, and resistance to feedback.
Where to locate scholarly publications
Picking wide, relevant keywords for your research topic is the first step. Since they are in charge of directing your search for literature and affecting the materials you gather to read, they must be carefully considered. Thanks to the additional benefit of employing search engines to assemble and index their historical references, you may access a vast online record repository. Later, you may expand on these keywords to arrange your analysis and help you narrow down the search into specific subheadings.
Researchers and information specialists looking for relevant references for a systematic assessment (SR) are frequently advised to search several repositories and employ other approaches to locate all material pertinent to the topic of interest safely. For randomized controlled trial reporting, the Cochrane Handbook advises accessing at least MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Embase, if suitable. Utilizing several databases has dangers. As the interfaces range from area codes to proximity operators, searchers struggle to convert a search method into several search syntaxes. Variations add another considerable translation cost in thesaurus terms between repositories. Additionally, reviewers must now display more titles and abstracts, which are likely irrelevant. Lastly, access to databases is frequently restricted.
Previous research has examined the extra cost of specialized themes in unique repositories. Some concluded that while looking at several databases has no impact on the outcome, looking at only one database could be adequate. Others countered that a single database is insufficient for comprehensive examinations that recover all references. Based on database coverage, most articles on this subject come to their findings. A recent essay attempted to locate an appropriate range of reading material to include an additional database, but there was no way to make a firm decision.
However, a search in that database may not provide any results, regardless of whether an item exists there or not. Despite this fundamental constraint, it is still unclear which repositories are necessary for a full examination to gather all pertinent references. We are thus assessing accurate retrieval across a range of databases to determine the likelihood that a single database or several database combinations can recover the crucial references in a systematic examination.
Other sites to look for
ScienceDirect
More than 4500 Elsevier articles and ebooks are accessible for free in full text through ScienceDirect. The Backfiles program allows users to search through a historical collection of more than 6.75 million articles. One of the main elements of Healey Library's collection of online scholarly publications is a compilation of newspapers.
Web of Science
You may find the Science Citation Index, the Social Sciences Citation Index, and the Arts & Humanities Citation Index on the Web of Science. Online reference databases that may be searched are one source of information. One example is MalaCards, a database on human conditions that combines reported research with data from clinical trials, genetic disease bases, and experimental sources from other reference databases. One source of information is searchable online reference databases, like MalaCards, a database on human conditions that combines published research with experimental sources from other reference databases as well as knowledge from clinical trials and genetic disease bases.
References
1. Edward, Barroga, and Vardaman Maya. "Essential Components of Educational Programs on Biomedical Writing, Editing, and Publishing." Journal of Korean Medical Science 30.10 (2015): 1381-1387.
2. Hartling, Lisa, et al. "The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study." BMC medical research methodology 16.1 (2016): 1-13.
3. Levay, Paul, Michael Raynor, and Daniel Tuvey. "The contributions of MEDLINE, other bibliographic databases and various search techniques to NICE public health guidance." Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice 10.1 (2015): 50-68.
