1. Epidemiology
2. Event Operations
3. Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Response
4. Point of Entry Health……
Introduction
Several principal literature evaluations on various elements of mass collecting evidence-based medicine in research have been conducted in the past. They released a paper at the time that examined the level of scientific knowledge and urged scholars to address critical concerns in the provision of good healthcare during a large-scale meeting. In effect, throughout five years, the took stock of development in this specific area of mass gatherings.
Methods
The following online databases were searched: GALE, NLM, Web of Science, Elsevier, Wiley, BMJ Journals, OUP, IngentaConnect, RMIT, DOAJ, and JSTOR. Grey literature and published news stories were removed. The levels of evidence were examined using the effectiveness classifications generated after the peer-reviewed publications were organized into pre-determined World Health Organization categories. Then, using Microsoft Excel®, a descriptive statistical analysis was performed.
The articles were gathered into their subject matter category, as resolute by the WHO. The types comprised of:
1. Epidemiology
2. Event Operations
3. Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Response
4. Point of Entry Health
5. Psychosocial Considerations
6. Public Information and Health Promotion
7. Emergency Medical Services
8. Environmental Deliberations
In addition, each publication was categorized using the JBI stages of evidence about the effectiveness as follows:
1. Meta-analysis of experimental trials (with homogeneity) (e.g., RCT with hidden randomization) OR A significant number of experimental trials with small confidence intervals
2. one or smaller RCTs with broader confidence intervals Studies using a quasi-experimental design (without randomization)
a) Cohort studies (including a control group), b) Case-controlled studies, and c) Observational studies (without control group)
3. Consensus, expert opinion, or physiological bench research
Discussion
Although high-level evidence studies may not be practicable in the setting of a mass gathering, investigations at the intermediate level should be promoted, so event management techniques are less reliant on experience and expert opinion. To construct a substantial body of knowledge, it is still necessary to carefully focus and further improve research in certain areas of mass collecting science. This prevalence of lower evidence-based practice literature review levels in the literature does not indicate that these research are uninformative or unusable in practice.
CONCLUSION
The development of theoretical models supported by more significant levels of evidence is required to underlie the creation of effective preventative and response models that can be used in various types and situations of mass gatherings. Some areas of mass information collection are still underdeveloped and require much work.
Continue Reading : https://bit.ly/3I9NmIz
Our Services : https://pubrica.com/services/physician-writing-services/clinical-literature-review-for-an-evidence-based-medicine/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
