One of the most common questions I get about the topic of advanced male chastity is about how desirable is it to have a chastity piercing, such as a Prince Albert, to ensure the security of the device.
™
The thinking behind it is fairly straightforward: many of the more secure, serious, and thus expensive chastity devices require the man to have a piercing in his penis so the chastity device can be locked into place properly.
Probably the most common combination is a Prince Albert piercing link liga788 (where the securing pin enters the penis through a hole in the underside of the head and exits through the urethra), but there are devices compatible with frenum and ampallang piercings, too.
So, this raises a couple of questions.
First, why would anyone do this?
Well, the answer to this is simple: it makes the devices much more secure.
Most chastity devices - even full belts - can be escaped by a man who's determined to do so, provided he uses enough lubrication and can endure a little pain.
It's possible there are some devices for which this isn't true but I've yet to come across one.
But a device secured with a piercing is as secure a chastity device as you're ever going to get, simply because the penis is held prisoner with a metal pin actually passing through the flesh.
And the devices' design means there's no way to remove the device without removing the pin first, unless you're willing
