171
views
views

The sources of financing for UK universities research are regularly required to be acknowledged. Research councils and charity organizations are well-known.
The Impact of International Students on UK University Research
The sources of financing for research conducted at UK universities are usually required to be explicitly recognized. Well-known names include research councils, charitable organizations, and medical foundations. One sort of donor, however, is missing from listings seen in newspapers, websites, structures, and endowed chair names.
The Higher Education Policy Institute published a report on cross-subsidization from teaching to research in 2020. Director Nick Hillman, who is known for being forthright about the financial realities of higher education, has said that UK university research is underfunded in relation to its genuine costs in ways that few, even inside the sector, really appreciate. The UK's shortfall was £4.3 billion, with England and Northern Ireland paying for £3.7 billion of the total spending.
So, how did universities fill the void? The solution was to change the price structure for overseas students. After deducting teaching costs, there is a surplus of more than £5,000 per student, which is used to fund not only the construction or renovation of facilities but also the direct costs of the research that results in the research excellence and reputations that attract so many students to the UK in the first place. Currently, sponsors recoup just around half of the cost of a domestic PhD in the United Kingdom, and only 72% of the real economic cost of research.
We should, at the very least, double-check our assumptions. To begin with, the budget deficit is not static; it is growing. Since the release of the HEPI report, university budgets have been placed under even greater pressure. Domestic tuition fees have been frozen again in real terms, making them worth one-third less than when they were initially introduced in 2012: a level that regularly falls short of paying current expenses. And now we’re dealing with the damaging impacts of inflation, notably in energy costs; the cost of sustaining the hot or cold temperatures essential for so much scientific study is growing at an ever-increasing pace. We should be cognizant that if we intend to continue UK university research productivity and quality, we may need to seek extra public money.
Second, supply is dependent on supply. International prices, as well as the international inflow of clever graduates that staff UK laboratories and research groups, are not assured. The pandemic’s persistent effect on China, as well as limitations on Chinese students’ travel, remind us that international people's movements may be hindered.
On everything from immigration costs and work placements to greater cultural awareness within mental health services and genuinely global career assistance, UK authorities must embrace the goals and perspectives of international students themselves. Embedding the International Student Charter, which the UK Council for Student Affairs is establishing with students, would promote long-term participation and reaction in the sector.
The United Kingdom is on pace to reach its international student target numbers, and its International Education Strategy intends to keep that momentum continuing. The principal action thus far has been to reintroduce post-study work, which is a cross-departmental government initiative comprising not just the Department for Education but also the Department for International Trade and the Home Office. Throughout COVID, the government demonstrated flexibility with respect to overseas students, which was crucial.
The families in Beijing and Bangalore, Kigali and Kuala Lumpur who are ready to spend so lavishly on their children’s education owe a debt of gratitude to those institutions enjoying their accomplishments in this week’s Research Excellence Framework.
However, we must ensure that our investment in UK university research continues to provide them with the highest possible return on their investment.
It is time for us to speak out about our debt to overseas students. And our policy making has to be more sensitive to what they seek in return.