menu
The STING pathway targeting technologies market is projected to grow at an annualized rate of ~25%,
The STING pathway targeting technologies market is projected to grow at an annualized rate of ~25%,
The STING pathway targeting technologies market is projected to grow at an annualized rate of ~25%, till 2030

The STING pathway targeting technologies market is projected to grow at an annualized rate of ~25%, till 2030

Roots Analysis has done a detailed study on STINGPathway Targeting Therapeutics and Technologies,2020-2030.” covering key aspects of the industry and identifyingfuture growth opportunities.

 

To order this 310+ page report, which features 150+ figuresand 200+ tables, please visit this link

 

Key Market Insights

§  Many small / macro molecule-based STING pathway modulators are currentlybeing evaluated as monotherapies as well as in combination with other drugs

§  The pipeline featurescandidates targeting different therapeutic areas and designed foradministration through a variety of routes; majority of such therapeutics arebeing developed as third-line and second-line treatments

§  In recent years,several well funded start-ups have entered this field of research, and aregradually developing proprietary products based on the STING pathway for thetreatment of a variety of indications

§  In addition, a numberof big pharmaceutical players have also partnered with developers focused onSTING targeting molecules in order to expand their respective capabilities inthis upcoming field of pharmacology

§  Published scientificliterature indicates that both industry and academic players have made equalcontributions to the innovation in this field; the major focus of such studiesis presently on anti-cancer therapeutics

§  Several non-profitorganizations have extended financial support to aid research efforts in thisdomain; the current focus appears to be on drug development and diseasemodelling studies

§  Foreseeing alucrative future, private and public investors have invested capital worth overUSD 2.5 billion, across more than 80 instances, in companies involved in STINGpathway research

§  The rising interestis also reflected in recent partnership activity, involving the activeparticipation of both international and indigenous companies; majority of thedeals have been focused on novel technology platforms

§  Multiple companiesare developing novel technology platforms for enhancing the research anddevelopment of STING pathway targeting therapeutics

§  Technology developersare expected to continue relying on licensing agreements involving differentSTING modulators as their primary source of revenues in the foreseen future

 

For more information, please visit https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/sting-pathway-targeting-therapeutics-and-technologies-market.html

 

Table of Contents

 

1.                PREFACE

1.1.              Scopeof the Report

1.2.              ResearchMethodology

1.3.              KeyQuestions Answered

1.4.              ChapterOutlines

 

2.                EXECUTIVESUMMARY

 

3.                INTRODUCTION

3.1.              Stimulator of Interferon Genes(STING) Pathway

3.2.              STING Signaling

3.2.1.           Relevance in Cancer

3.2.2.           Relevance in Autoimmune Diseases

3.2.3.           Relevance in Antimicrobial HostDefense

 

3.3.              STING Pathway Modulators

3.3.1.           STING Agonists

3.3.2.           STING Antagonists

3.3.3.           STING Activating Drug DeliverySystems

3.3.4.           Indirect STING Activating Therapies

3.4.              Key Variants of STING

3.5.              Non-immunological Functions of theSTING Pathway

3.6.              Concluding Remarks

 

4.                STING PATHWAY TARGETINGTHERAPEUTICS: CURRENT MARKET LANDSCAPE

4.1.              ChapterOverview

4.2.              STINGPathway Targeting Therapeutics: Development Pipeline

4.2.1.           Analysisby Type of STING Modulator

4.2.2.           Analysisby Type of Molecule

4.2.3.           Analysisby Phase of Development

4.2.4.           Analysisby Therapeutic Area

4.2.5.           Analysisby Type of Therapy

4.2.6.           Analysisby Route of Administration

4.2.7.           Analysisby Line of Treatment

 

4.3.              STINGPathway Targeting Therapeutics: Developer Landscape

4.3.1.           Analysisby Year of Establishment

4.3.2.           Analysisby Company Size

4.3.3.           Analysisby Geography

4.3.4.           MostActive Players

 

4.4.              STINGPathway Targeting Therapeutics: List of Clinical Trials

4.4.1.           Analysisby Trial Recruitment Status

4.4.2.           Analysisby Study Design

4.4.3.           Analysisby Key Clinical Endpoints

 

5.                STING PATHWAY TARGETINGTECHNOLOGIES: CURRENT MARKET LANDSCAPE

5.1.              Chapter Overview

5.2.              STING Pathway Targeting Technologies:List of Technology Developers

5.2.1.           Analysis by Type of Modulator

5.2.2.           Analysis by Type of Molecule

5.2.3.           Analysis by Year of Establishment

5.2.4.           Analysis by Company Size

5.2.5.           Analysis by Geography

 

6.                COMPANY PROFILES

6.1.              Chapter Overview

6.2               STINGAgonist Developers

6.2.1.           AduroBiotech

6.2.1.1.        CompanyOverview

6.2.1.2.        FinancialInformation

6.2.1.3.        ProductDescription: ADU-S100 (MIW815)

6.2.1.4.        RecentDevelopments and Future Outlook

 

6.2.2.           Bristol-MyersSquibb

6.2.2.1.        CompanyOverview

6.2.2.2.        FinancialInformation

6.2.2.3.        ProductDescription: BMS-986301

6.2.2.4.        RecentDevelopments and Future Outlook

 

6.2.3.           Eisai

6.2.3.1.        CompanyOverview

6.2.3.2.        FinancialInformation

6.2.3.3.        ProductDescription: E7766

6.2.3.4.        RecentDevelopments and Future Outlook

 

6.2.4            GlaxoSmithKline

6.2.4.1.        CompanyOverview

6.2.4.2.        FinancialInformation

6.2.4.3.        ProductDescription: GSK3745417

6.2.4.4.        RecentDevelopments and Future Outlook

 

6.2.5.           ImmuneSensorTherapeutics

6.2.5.1.        CompanyOverview

6.2.5.2.        ProductDescription: IMSA101

 

6.2.6.           Merck

6.2.6.1.        CompanyOverview

6.2.6.2.        FinancialInformation

6.2.6.3.        ProductDescription: MK-1454 and MK-2118

6.2.6.4.        RecentDevelopments and Future Outlook

 

6.2.7.           Noxopharm

6.2.7.1.        CompanyOverview

6.2.7.2.        ProductDescription: NOX66

6.2.7.3.        RecentDevelopments and Future Outlook

 

6.2.8.           SpringBank Pharmaceuticals

6.2.8.1.        CompanyOverview

6.2.8.2.        FinancialInformation

6.2.8.3.        ProductDescription: SB 11285

6.2.8.4.        RecentDevelopments and Future Outlook

 

6.2.9.           Synlogic

6.2.9.1.        CompanyOverview

6.2.9.2.        FinancialInformation

6.2.9.3.        ProductDescription: SYNB1891

6.2.9.4.        RecentDevelopments and Future Outlook

 

6.3.              STINGAntagonist Developers

6.3.1            AvammuneTherapeutics

6.3.2.           Curadev

6.3.3            ImmuneSensorTherapeutics

6.3.4.           NimbusTherapeutics

6.3.5.           Sirenas

6.3.6.           SpringBank Pharmaceuticals

6.3.7.           STINGINN

6.3.8.           STipeTherapeutics

 

7                 ACADEMIC GRANT ANALYSIS

7.1.              Chapter Overview

7.2.              Scope and Methodology

7.3.              STING Pathway Targeting Therapeutics:List of Academic Grants

7.3.1.           Analysis by Number of Grants

7.3.2.           Analysis by Amount Awarded

7.3.3.           Analysis by Funding Institute

7.3.4.           Analysis by Support Period

7.3.5.           Analysis by Funding Mechanism

7.3.6.           Analysis by Type of Grant Application

7.3.7.           Analysis by Grant Activity Code

7.3.8.           Analysis by Funding Institutes

7.3.9.           Analysis by Type of RecipientOrganization

7.3.10          Regional Distribution of GrantRecipients

7.3.11          Most Popular Recipient Organizations:Analysis by Number of Grants and Amount Invested

7.3.12.         Prominent Project Leaders: Analysis byNumber of Grants

7.3.13          Analysis by Support Year and AmountAwarded

7.3.14.         Analysis by Study Section

7.4.              Grant Attractiveness Analysis

 

8                 STING RELATED INITIATIVES OFBIG PHARMACEUTICALS PLAYERS

8.1.              Chapter Overview

8.2.              Scope and Methodology

8.3.              Initiatives Undertaken by BigPharma Players

8.3.1.           Analysis by Portfolio Diversity

8.3.2.           Analysis by Type of Molecule

8.3.3.           Analysis by Phase of Development

8.3.4.           Analysis by Therapeutic Area

8.3.5.           Analysis by Type of Therapy

8.3.6.           Analysis by Route of Administration

 

8.4.              Benchmarking Big Pharma Players

8.4.1            Spider Web Analysis: AbbVie

8.4.2.           Spider Web Analysis: Bayer

8.4.3.           Spider Web Analysis: Bristol-MyersSquibb

8.4.4.           Spider Web Analysis: Celgene

8.4.5.           Spider Web Analysis: Eisai

8.4.6.           Spider Web Analysis: Eli Lily

8.4.7.           Spider Web Analysis: Genentech

8.4.8.           Spider Web Analysis: GlaxoSmithKline

8.4.9.           Spider Web Analysis: Merck

8.4.10.         Spider Web Analysis: Novartis

8.4.11.         Spider Web Analysis: Novo Nordisk

8.4.12.         Spider Web Analysis: Pfizer

8.4.13.         Spider Web Analysis: Roche

8.4.14.         Spider Web Analysis: TakedaPharmaceuticals

 

9                 START-UP HEALTH INDEXING

9.1.              Chapter Overview

9.2.              Scope and Methodology

9.3.              Benchmarking of Start-ups

9.3.1.           Analysis by Portfolio Diversity

9.3.2.           Analysis by Type of Molecule

9.3.3.           Analysis by Phase of Development

9.3.4            Analysis by Therapeutic Area

9.3.5.           Analysis by Funding Amount

9.3.6.           Analysis by Number of Investors

9.3.7.           Analysis by Type of Funding

9.3.8.           Analysis by Partnership Activity

9.3.9.           Analysis by Other Parameters

9.3.10.         Analysis by Location of Headquarters

9.3.11.         Start-up Health Indexing: RootsAnalysis Perspective

 

10                PUBLICATION ANALYSIS

10.1.            ChapterOverview

10.2.            Scopeand Methodology

10.3.            STINGPathway Targeting Therapeutics: Recent Publications

10.3.1.         Analysisby Type of Publication

10.3.2.         Analysisby Type of Publication and Year

10.3.3.         Analysisby Study Objective

10.3.4.         Analysisby Popular Keywords

10.3.5.         Analysisby Type of STING Modulator

10.3.6.         Analysisby Target Pathway

10.3.7.         Analysisby Therapeutic Area

10.3.8.         Analysisby Type of STING Modulator and Therapeutic Area

10.3.9          Analysis by Type of Publisher

10.3.10.       Leading Players: Analysis by Number ofPublications

10.3.11.       Leading Players: Geographical Analysis byNumber of Publications

10.3.12.       Analysisby First Author Organization

10.3.13.       KeyJournals: Analysis by Number of Publications

 

11                PARTNERSHIPSAND COLLABORATIONS

11.1.            Chapter Overview

11.2.            Partnership Models

11.3.            STING Pathway TargetingTherapeutics: Recent Partnerships

11.3.1.         Analysis by Year of Partnership

11.3.2.         Analysis by Type of Partnership

11.3.3          Analysis by Type of STING Modulator

11.3.4.         Analysis by Therapeutic Area

11.3.5.         Analysis by Technology Platform

11.3.6.         Most Active Players: Analysis by Numberof Partnerships

 

11.3.7.         Geographical Analysis

11.3.7.1       Most Active Players: Analysis by Numberof partnerships

11.3.7.2.      Intercontinental and IntracontinentalAgreements

 

12.               FUNDINGAND INVESTMENT ANALYSIS

12.1.            ChapterOverview

12.2.            Typesof Funding

12.3.            STINGPathway Targeting Therapeutics: Recent Funding Instances

12.3.1.         Analysisby Number of Funding Instances

12.3.2.         Analysisby Amount Invested

12.3.3.         Analysisby Type of Funding

12.3.4.         Analysisby Type of STING Modulator

12.3.6.         Analysisby Therapeutic Area

12.3.6          Analysisby Amount Invested and Type of STING Technology Platform

12.3.7.         MostActive Players: Analysis by Number of Funding Instances

12.3.8.         MostActive Investors: Analysis by Number of Funding Instances

12.3.9.         GeographicalAnalysis by Amount Invested

12.4.            ConcludingRemarks

 

13.               MARKET SIZING AND OPPORTUNITYANALYSIS

13.1.            Chapter Overview

13.2.            Key Assumptions and Forecast Methodology

13.3.            Global STING Pathway TargetingTechnologies Market, 2020-2030

13.3.1.         STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket by Upfront Payments, 2020-2030

13.3.2.         STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket by Milestone Payments, 2020-2030

13.3.3.         STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket: Distribution by Type of STING Modulator

13.3.3.1.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Agonist, 2020-2030

13.3.3.2.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Antagonist, 2020-2030

 

13.3.4.         STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket: Distribution by Therapeutic Area

13.3.4.1.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Oncological Disorders, 2020-2030

13.3.4.2.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Inflammatory Disorders, 2020-2030

13.3.4.3.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Infectious Diseases, 2020-2030

13.3.4.4.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Other Therapeutic Areas, 2020-2030

 

13.3.5.         STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket: Distribution by Route of Administration

13.3.5.1.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Intratumoral Route, 2020-2030

13.3.5.2.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Intravenous Route, 2020-2030

13.3.5.3.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Oral Route, 2020-2030

13.3.5.4.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Subcutaneous Route, 2020-2030

13.3.5.5.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Other Routes, 2020-2030

 

13.3.6.         STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket: Distribution by Type of Molecule

13.3.6.1.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Non-Nucleotide, 2020-2030

13.3.6.2.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Cyclic Dinucleotide, 2020-2030

13.3.6.3.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Live Biotherapeutics, 2020-2030

13.3.6.4.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Oncolytic Viruses, 2020-2030

13.3.6.5.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket for Synthetic Peptides, 2020-2030

13.3.6.6.      STING Pathway Targeting Technologies Marketfor Other Molecules, 2020-2030

 

13.3.7.         STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket: Distribution by Geography

13.3.7.1.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket in North America, 2020-2030

13.3.7.2.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket in Europe, 2020-2030

13.3.7.3.      STING Pathway Targeting TechnologiesMarket in Asia-Pacific, 2020-2030

 

14.               EXECUTIVEINSIGHTS

 

15.               CONCLUDING REMARKS

15.1.            Chapter Overview

15.2.            Key Takeaways

 

16.               APPENDIX1: TABULATED DATA

 

17.               APPENDIX2: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

 

Contact Details

Gaurav Chaudhary

+1 (415) 800 3415

gaurav.chaudhary@rootsanalysis.com